--------------------------------------------------------------------
Skeptics are fond of pointing out things we can't know for certain about purported Ivory-bill sightings, so I'll take a moment to point out a few other things we simply don't know for certain:
1) In the last 60 years how many times have birders in deep woods briefly seen a large black-and-white woodpecker fly through the canopy and routinely written it off as a Pileated without a second thought... when in fact it was an Ivory-bill?
2) How many non-birders over that time have encountered Ivory-bills, but didn't know what they were seeing and never reported it?
3) How many birders over that time have seen Ivory-bills, and feel certain of it, but never reported it, believing it either unethical or simply useless to do so?
4) And finally, we simply don't know for certain what the behaviors, habitat needs, food requirements, breeding habits, or lifespans of any IBWOs remaining today are -- at best we know some info only as it pertained to a small sample of Ivory-bills from over 60 years ago; even information about calls, wingbeats, and flight pattern, could have changed from the small (representative???) sampling obtained early on, over the passing generations since. Humans have a myopic tendency to perceive all species, other than themselves, as unchanging over time... it ain't necessarily so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday, May 30, 2006
Saturday, May 27, 2006
-- April "Auk" Article (from Cornell) --
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks to folks at "BirdForum" the April response by Cornell to Jerry Jackson's Jan. Auk article was found online here. It is lengthy and obviously worth reading though Cornell seems to be using a blunderbust instead of a scalpel to bury Jackson in criticisms many of which are important but others of which are picayunish or simply semantic in nature, and more importantly almost all of which are simply irresolvable at this point. Unfortunately, in the public arena, skeptics have played their arguments so well (in conjunction with a press that loves dueling experts) that much of what is out there can simply be interpreted or argued different ways. Moreover, they have succeeded in raising the bar of required evidence to that of indisputable photographic or video evidence (which will likely eventually come, but it won't be easy). A lengthy sighting by Sibley or Kaufman might also be accepted (and I mean literally only those two out of all American ornithologists at this point!), but short of that the fact is there is always room for skepticism over other sightings, acoustic data, foraging signs, and even DNA (if we ever got any) can be flawed. Needless to say, this is an unfortunate state of affairs (this ponderous climate of cynicism), possibly unique in the annals of ornithology -- by its inherent nature field biology is rarely a truly precise or meticulous science of the sort some are imagining, and almost any journal article can be taken to task if one is determined to do so. Sad too, the sharp division arisen between so many prominent field professionals.
When I first read about Ivory-bills 40+ years ago there was no doubt in my mind that they still existed, and today I feel no less certain (considering ALL the evidence) -- though the possible numbers are quite worrisome. But alas, through all the trying circumstances, convincing the multitudes of folks out there seems to get harder and harder with every new ray of hope (...and sadly the main consequence of Cornell's first large-scale search season, despite valiant efforts to defend themselves and challenge Jackson et. al., has been, in the press, to further feed that skepticism).
Addendum, looking on the bright side: With Cornell's departure the Cache River area has once again been opened to the public. With an influx of people possibly there will be more IBWO sightings (both real and imagined) in months ahead -- the more sightings the more possibilities for photo/video. Moreover, many of the best bird spotters around probably felt they simply could NOT be a part of the Cornell team and be placed under such strict contractual dictums -- in short, they would want to retain full control over their own pictures, notes, reports, recordings, press releases etc. They will now be more free to roam the Cache in such an individual effort.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks to folks at "BirdForum" the April response by Cornell to Jerry Jackson's Jan. Auk article was found online here. It is lengthy and obviously worth reading though Cornell seems to be using a blunderbust instead of a scalpel to bury Jackson in criticisms many of which are important but others of which are picayunish or simply semantic in nature, and more importantly almost all of which are simply irresolvable at this point. Unfortunately, in the public arena, skeptics have played their arguments so well (in conjunction with a press that loves dueling experts) that much of what is out there can simply be interpreted or argued different ways. Moreover, they have succeeded in raising the bar of required evidence to that of indisputable photographic or video evidence (which will likely eventually come, but it won't be easy). A lengthy sighting by Sibley or Kaufman might also be accepted (and I mean literally only those two out of all American ornithologists at this point!), but short of that the fact is there is always room for skepticism over other sightings, acoustic data, foraging signs, and even DNA (if we ever got any) can be flawed. Needless to say, this is an unfortunate state of affairs (this ponderous climate of cynicism), possibly unique in the annals of ornithology -- by its inherent nature field biology is rarely a truly precise or meticulous science of the sort some are imagining, and almost any journal article can be taken to task if one is determined to do so. Sad too, the sharp division arisen between so many prominent field professionals.
When I first read about Ivory-bills 40+ years ago there was no doubt in my mind that they still existed, and today I feel no less certain (considering ALL the evidence) -- though the possible numbers are quite worrisome. But alas, through all the trying circumstances, convincing the multitudes of folks out there seems to get harder and harder with every new ray of hope (...and sadly the main consequence of Cornell's first large-scale search season, despite valiant efforts to defend themselves and challenge Jackson et. al., has been, in the press, to further feed that skepticism).
Addendum, looking on the bright side: With Cornell's departure the Cache River area has once again been opened to the public. With an influx of people possibly there will be more IBWO sightings (both real and imagined) in months ahead -- the more sightings the more possibilities for photo/video. Moreover, many of the best bird spotters around probably felt they simply could NOT be a part of the Cornell team and be placed under such strict contractual dictums -- in short, they would want to retain full control over their own pictures, notes, reports, recordings, press releases etc. They will now be more free to roam the Cache in such an individual effort.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Friday, May 26, 2006
-- B. Harrison's Outlook --
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The below article summarizes part of what Bobby Harrison is saying these days in talks around the country, including the following thought:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The below article summarizes part of what Bobby Harrison is saying these days in talks around the country, including the following thought:
"[The ivory-bill] travels to post-disaster areas, feeding off the beetles found in trees about two years after a hurricane, fire or ice storm, he said. So Harrison's team plans to search wooded areas in South Alabama and the Panhandle this fall -- two years after Ivan. The team already has received calls from bird-watchers reporting ivory-billed sightings."http://www.gulfcoastgateway.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060526/NEWS01/605260332/1006
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thursday, May 25, 2006
--A Few Chuckles --
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing new in this current article but some good lines worth a laugh....
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing new in this current article but some good lines worth a laugh....
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday, May 22, 2006
-- Sidenote --
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
As a sidenote thought this picture of an unknown seabird flying over Wash. DC. from another blog somewhat interesting. Interesting not only from the standpoint of ID'ing it, but from the IBWO-controversy standpoint because of the glaring whiteness of the left-hand wing -- one might expect that wing to clearly show the same black tip pattern of the right wing, but instead is totally-washed out in white, indicating the problems that angle and lighting introduce to photography and why in part the Luneau video remains so controversial. Keep in mind that this is a single still photograph while David's video of course involves many individual frames, and also that Cornell has size and wingbeat analysis (which one may or may not accept) to go with their 'Elvis' video, but still I think it gives some indication of why photographic visual cues alone can be so tricky.
http://dcaudubon.blogspot.com/2006/05/mystery-seabird-in-dc.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a sidenote thought this picture of an unknown seabird flying over Wash. DC. from another blog somewhat interesting. Interesting not only from the standpoint of ID'ing it, but from the IBWO-controversy standpoint because of the glaring whiteness of the left-hand wing -- one might expect that wing to clearly show the same black tip pattern of the right wing, but instead is totally-washed out in white, indicating the problems that angle and lighting introduce to photography and why in part the Luneau video remains so controversial. Keep in mind that this is a single still photograph while David's video of course involves many individual frames, and also that Cornell has size and wingbeat analysis (which one may or may not accept) to go with their 'Elvis' video, but still I think it gives some indication of why photographic visual cues alone can be so tricky.
http://dcaudubon.blogspot.com/2006/05/mystery-seabird-in-dc.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sunday, May 21, 2006
-- The Word From Cornell --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For anyone who hasn't seen it here is the statement sent out by Cornell to its subscribers summarizing the 2005-6 IBWO search. It makes several important points:
....and a further word from me: as could be expected, much press reportage since Cornell's announcement has once again stated or implied that the Ivory-bill is extinct, because of the search's failure to attain photographic evidence from this one locale of attention -- Cornell acknowledges they no longer believe it likely that IBWOs reside in the Bayou de View area of the 2-year-ago sightings. This says nothing about the remainder of the Big Woods or the other areas of the Southeast that remain to be studied. Scientifically there simply remains no solid basis, other than impatience, for assuming the Ivory-bill extinct. Indeed, no bird has ever been declared extinct with an equivalent history of sightings/claims. The unfortunate consequence of Cornell's efforts and the subsequent controversy will now be even more skepticism/cynicism toward future sighting reports and a retrenchment of the interest in the species that had taken so long to establish. Possibly one of the automatic camera units will yet capture the evidence desired. Or else it may now fall on one of the original sighters to re-double their efforts to attain that evidence if only to rescue their own credibility (...and speaking engagements!!); or maybe it will be some other persistent searcher from Mike Collins to Jerry Jackson to Bob Russell or Mary Scott to get the needed photo; it is unfortunately the case that many others drawn into the search this season will now pack up their interest and energy and move on to other things, skepticism having won the day in many quarters. Hamlet famously pronounced, "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy" -- with patience and persistence, possiby the truth of that sentiment will yet be demonstrated to those of a cynical bent...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For anyone who hasn't seen it here is the statement sent out by Cornell to its subscribers summarizing the 2005-6 IBWO search. It makes several important points:
"The 2005-2006 search for the Ivory-billed Woodpecker has now drawn to a close in Arkansas. Search team leaders from the Lab of Ornithology and Audubon Arkansas, plus Recovery Team leaders from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service held a news conference Thursday to talk about the field season and what happens next. These were the main points from the conference:-----------------------------------------------------
- During this field season, the search team did not collect any additional confirmation of ivory-bills in the Big Woods. They are now fairly sure that there is not a pair of ivory-bills residing in the Bayou de View area of the Cache River National Wildlife Refuge, the area where there was a number of sightings in the 2004-2005 field season. They believe the bird spotted there in 2004 is no longer frequenting the area. Because of this, managed access restrictions have been lifted--a move supported by the Lab.
- Enough positive data have been gathered to warrant a continuation of the search for another field season in Arkansas. It's likely the effort will be scaled down somewhat, and rely heavily on volunteers to conduct the fieldwork. Remote time-lapse camera systems have been perfected and will also be used, along with autonomous recording units to capture sounds in the forest. Search efforts have already been expanded into other states, such as Texas, Louisiana, and South Carolina, overseen by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Lab staff will assist those searches with equipment and methodology. A small, mobile ivory-bill search team will also be formed to deploy to areas where promising encounters may occur.
- During the field season just ended, there were four brief possible sightings, one by a volunteer, and three by members of the public. In each case they saw one field mark: an expanse of white on the trailing edge of the bird's wing as it was flying. No pictures were obtained.
- On a number of occasions, searchers heard possible kent calls and double raps that are characteristic of the ivory-bill. Some of the double-raps were recorded on video camera sound tracks and are being analyzed now to confirm whether or not they match ivory-bill sounds. Although there were fewer visual encounters this season, there have been more occasions when people heard potential ivory-bill sounds.
- This season, search teams covered 33,000 acres of forest searching for roost holes, nest holes, or signs of ivory-bill foraging. Combined with last year's effort, 72,000 acres have been searched. That amounts to 13 percent of the total habitat available in the Big Woods. The team has found 10 cavities that are the right size and shape for the ivory-bill and much too large for the Pileated Woodpecker. That is the number that researchers say they would expect to find for a bird as rare as the ivory-bill which requires a large amount of territory.
- Both the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and the Cornell Lab of Ornithology stand behind the conclusion that the bird videotaped in the Cache River National Wildlife Refuge in February 2005 is indeed an Ivory-billed Woodpecker. It may take years of searching to find the bird or birds again. According to the leader of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker Recovery Team from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, the agency is a "long way" from declaring that the ivory-bill is extinct.
- The Recovery Team has drafted a recovery plan for the ivory-bill for internal review, and it will be released for public comment toward the end of September. The search team from the Lab of Ornithology will have a final report on the findings of this past season later in the summer.
Certainly our deepest thanks go out to all the wonderful volunteers and professional full-time staff who joined us in the 2005-2006 search season--more than 100 of some of the best field biologists and birders in the nation. They were unfailingly eager, enthusiastic, and dedicated. Much good conservation work has been done by The Nature Conservancy, Audubon Arkansas, and others since news of the rediscovery. Welcome attention has been focused on saving the unique ecosystem of the Big Woods and the many birds and animals that inhabit its green corridors. We're still in high gear and still going to keep searching, using the most rigorous scientific methods, keeping an open mind, but being very cautious about our conclusions, as we have been so far.
We're deeply grateful for all the interest in and support for this project that you have shown. Stay tuned!"
....and a further word from me: as could be expected, much press reportage since Cornell's announcement has once again stated or implied that the Ivory-bill is extinct, because of the search's failure to attain photographic evidence from this one locale of attention -- Cornell acknowledges they no longer believe it likely that IBWOs reside in the Bayou de View area of the 2-year-ago sightings. This says nothing about the remainder of the Big Woods or the other areas of the Southeast that remain to be studied. Scientifically there simply remains no solid basis, other than impatience, for assuming the Ivory-bill extinct. Indeed, no bird has ever been declared extinct with an equivalent history of sightings/claims. The unfortunate consequence of Cornell's efforts and the subsequent controversy will now be even more skepticism/cynicism toward future sighting reports and a retrenchment of the interest in the species that had taken so long to establish. Possibly one of the automatic camera units will yet capture the evidence desired. Or else it may now fall on one of the original sighters to re-double their efforts to attain that evidence if only to rescue their own credibility (...and speaking engagements!!); or maybe it will be some other persistent searcher from Mike Collins to Jerry Jackson to Bob Russell or Mary Scott to get the needed photo; it is unfortunately the case that many others drawn into the search this season will now pack up their interest and energy and move on to other things, skepticism having won the day in many quarters. Hamlet famously pronounced, "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy" -- with patience and persistence, possiby the truth of that sentiment will yet be demonstrated to those of a cynical bent...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Friday, May 19, 2006
-- Perspective --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thus far less than 15% of the Big Woods region has been much explored by IBWO searchers; although the Bayou de View area does not appear to hold IBWOs, the White River area (which many believed all along held the best habitat) has not been as thoroughly combed, and other areas have been untouched.
Before 2004, Arkansas wasn't even on many IBWO searchers' radar as a likely place to harbor the species. Both then and now Florida, Louisiana, and Mississippi, held the greatest hope for numbers of Ivory-bills, with Texas and S. Carolina not far behind, and Georgia, Alabama, and some other areas still having possibilities. The significance of the AR. sightings for me was NOT what it said about IBWO existence, but what it potentially said about the NUMBERS that might still persist. On that score I am once again somewhat pessimistic, but not on the issue of existence.
Despite discouragement at Cornell's search results it is vital to keep things in perspective, especially since 3 issues/questions continually get muddled together unnecessarily in this whole affair:
1) Do Ivory-bills still survive in America?
2) Do Ivory-bills exist in the Big Woods of Arkansas?
3) Is the bird in the Luneau film clip an Ivory-bill?
If the answer to #3 is "Yes" than obviously the answer to all 3 questions is 'yes,' but unfortunately too many people seem to assume that if the answer is 'no' than the answers to #1 and #2 are also 'no,' when in fact a 'no' answer says NOTHING about those (more important) questions. (Similarly, if the answer to #1 is 'no' than the other 2 questions are automatically also 'no,' but if the answer is 'yes' it says nothing about the answers to the other 2.)
In short, the best we can say for now from Cornell's results is that there is likely no current population of Ivory-bills residing in the Bayou de View area of Arkansas, but in all truth, we can't go far beyond that, though skeptics will continue to simplify matters by choosing to do so. Overgeneralization is a constant bugaboo in biological study. The leap from no Ivory-bills in a section of the Big Woods of Arkansas to 'Ivory-bills are extinct' is quite simply... a leap of faith, not of science.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thus far less than 15% of the Big Woods region has been much explored by IBWO searchers; although the Bayou de View area does not appear to hold IBWOs, the White River area (which many believed all along held the best habitat) has not been as thoroughly combed, and other areas have been untouched.
Before 2004, Arkansas wasn't even on many IBWO searchers' radar as a likely place to harbor the species. Both then and now Florida, Louisiana, and Mississippi, held the greatest hope for numbers of Ivory-bills, with Texas and S. Carolina not far behind, and Georgia, Alabama, and some other areas still having possibilities. The significance of the AR. sightings for me was NOT what it said about IBWO existence, but what it potentially said about the NUMBERS that might still persist. On that score I am once again somewhat pessimistic, but not on the issue of existence.
Despite discouragement at Cornell's search results it is vital to keep things in perspective, especially since 3 issues/questions continually get muddled together unnecessarily in this whole affair:
1) Do Ivory-bills still survive in America?
2) Do Ivory-bills exist in the Big Woods of Arkansas?
3) Is the bird in the Luneau film clip an Ivory-bill?
If the answer to #3 is "Yes" than obviously the answer to all 3 questions is 'yes,' but unfortunately too many people seem to assume that if the answer is 'no' than the answers to #1 and #2 are also 'no,' when in fact a 'no' answer says NOTHING about those (more important) questions. (Similarly, if the answer to #1 is 'no' than the other 2 questions are automatically also 'no,' but if the answer is 'yes' it says nothing about the answers to the other 2.)
In short, the best we can say for now from Cornell's results is that there is likely no current population of Ivory-bills residing in the Bayou de View area of Arkansas, but in all truth, we can't go far beyond that, though skeptics will continue to simplify matters by choosing to do so. Overgeneralization is a constant bugaboo in biological study. The leap from no Ivory-bills in a section of the Big Woods of Arkansas to 'Ivory-bills are extinct' is quite simply... a leap of faith, not of science.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Read It and Weep --
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have your Prozac ready and within arm's reach....
The (de)press(ing) news coverage has begun of Cornell's 2005-6 Ivory-bill search results. Following are some of the initial articles reporting on the (lack of) findings. The first one, from a Chicago Tribune writer, is probably the best of the lot and most thorough (2nd from Reuters, 3rd from Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 4th the NY Times). The number of possible 'sightings' being reported is even lower than anitcipated: four (3 from the public, only one from a Cornell volunteer). And even more disheartening than the scarcity of human sightings is the lack of current evidence from automatic remote cameras, or truly strong indications for roost holes, nestholes, or bark scrapings (acoustic data still being analyzed, but nothing dramatic reported); possibly there will be more hopeful details given at tomorrow's official presentation in AR., or possibly not. The rift between those who believe in the species' persistence and those who don't is bound to only worsen, but as that great ornithologist Yogi Berra always said, 'It's not over 'til it's over...' and it ain't over yet, as for the first time in 60 years real searches in multiple areas are finally taking place, but it certainly can't be a happy day in Brinkley or Clarendon, AR.... or Ithaca, NY :
http://www.sunherald.com/mld/sunherald/news/nation/14613990.htm
http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/36456/story.htm
http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/science/stories/0518woodpecker.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/19/science/19bird.html?ex=1305691200&en=40a8cc170868fce2&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have your Prozac ready and within arm's reach....
The (de)press(ing) news coverage has begun of Cornell's 2005-6 Ivory-bill search results. Following are some of the initial articles reporting on the (lack of) findings. The first one, from a Chicago Tribune writer, is probably the best of the lot and most thorough (2nd from Reuters, 3rd from Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 4th the NY Times). The number of possible 'sightings' being reported is even lower than anitcipated: four (3 from the public, only one from a Cornell volunteer). And even more disheartening than the scarcity of human sightings is the lack of current evidence from automatic remote cameras, or truly strong indications for roost holes, nestholes, or bark scrapings (acoustic data still being analyzed, but nothing dramatic reported); possibly there will be more hopeful details given at tomorrow's official presentation in AR., or possibly not. The rift between those who believe in the species' persistence and those who don't is bound to only worsen, but as that great ornithologist Yogi Berra always said, 'It's not over 'til it's over...' and it ain't over yet, as for the first time in 60 years real searches in multiple areas are finally taking place, but it certainly can't be a happy day in Brinkley or Clarendon, AR.... or Ithaca, NY :
http://www.sunherald.com/mld/sunherald/news/nation/14613990.htm
http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/36456/story.htm
http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/science/stories/0518woodpecker.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/19/science/19bird.html?ex=1305691200&en=40a8cc170868fce2&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thursday, May 18, 2006
-- Cornell Releases Statement --
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today Cornell released an initial statement of their 2005-6 IBWO search findings, with, as expected, nothing really significant to report. The release begins as follows:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today Cornell released an initial statement of their 2005-6 IBWO search findings, with, as expected, nothing really significant to report. The release begins as follows:
"There were teasing glimpses and tantalizing sounds, but the 2005-2006 search for the Ivory-billed Woodpecker in Arkansas has concluded without the definitive visual documentation being sought. The search, led by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, with support from Audubon Arkansas, stretched from November through April when ivory-bill activity would be highest and a lack of leaf-cover permitted clear views through the dense forest. The search included 22 full-time searchers and state-of-the-art acoustic and video monitoring technology. To supplement the full-time effort, volunteer groups of 14 spent two weeks at a time helping to search the 550,000-acre area focused on the Cache and White River National Wildlife Refuges.Saturday is the official day for their report announcement at the Clarendon Birding Festival so there will likely be additional details available at that point. As the Chicago Cubs would say, 'there's always next season.' But seriously, there are still other searchers to hear from and other locales to scour along with Cache/White River so while skeptics have a field day relax, take some deep breaths, and don't despair...
'The search teams were very skilled, not only technically but in the execution of the search,' said Dr. John Fitzpatrick, director of the Cornell Lab of Ornithology. “Even though we didn’t get additional definitive evidence of the ivory-bill in Arkansas, we’re not discouraged. The vastness of the forest combined with the highly mobile nature of the bird warrant additional searching.”
(full statement at: http://www.birds.cornell.edu/ivory/latest/end_of_season)
(also, related story here.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, May 17, 2006
-- IBWO Front License Plate --
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Many of us were envious when the state of Arkansas offered a handsome Ivory-bill license plate to it's residents earlier this year -- now a version of that plate is available to anyone living in the 20-or-so other states that permit front license tags on vehicles, for about $20 (other items available as well):
http://www.ivory-bill-woodpecker.com/ivory-bill-license-plate.htm
There continue to be a few Ivory-bill related articles or listserv mentions popping up on the Web, but with no real new or confirmed information -- I'm opting not to make mention of or link to any of these 'more-of-the-same' pieces until Cornell has their say on the 20th, so may not have anything to post next couple of days unless something otherwise merits it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Many of us were envious when the state of Arkansas offered a handsome Ivory-bill license plate to it's residents earlier this year -- now a version of that plate is available to anyone living in the 20-or-so other states that permit front license tags on vehicles, for about $20 (other items available as well):
http://www.ivory-bill-woodpecker.com/ivory-bill-license-plate.htm
There continue to be a few Ivory-bill related articles or listserv mentions popping up on the Web, but with no real new or confirmed information -- I'm opting not to make mention of or link to any of these 'more-of-the-same' pieces until Cornell has their say on the 20th, so may not have anything to post next couple of days unless something otherwise merits it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Friday, May 12, 2006
-- Of Moving, Mike C., and May 20th --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm still in the midst of moving but hope to finish this weekend and be more regular on the Web by Mon. or Tues.
Luckily, I haven't been missing too much IBWO-wise, and probably won't be much hard IBWO news before Cornell begins releasing their summary report on May 20th -- they apparently are also releasing their contracted volunteers to speak more freely at that time as well... hmmm, do we need a drrrrumroll... or just some piccolo music???
And Mike Collins has just posted an update to his venture in the Pearl River region on BirdChat pleading for more conservation action to be taken in that area (claiming at least a pair of IBWOs):
http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0605b&L=birdchat&P=3378
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm still in the midst of moving but hope to finish this weekend and be more regular on the Web by Mon. or Tues.
Luckily, I haven't been missing too much IBWO-wise, and probably won't be much hard IBWO news before Cornell begins releasing their summary report on May 20th -- they apparently are also releasing their contracted volunteers to speak more freely at that time as well... hmmm, do we need a drrrrumroll... or just some piccolo music???
And Mike Collins has just posted an update to his venture in the Pearl River region on BirdChat pleading for more conservation action to be taken in that area (claiming at least a pair of IBWOs):
http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0605b&L=birdchat&P=3378
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sunday, May 07, 2006
-- NY Times Article --
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry for the lapse; I'm busily in process of moving (...not to Brinkley, AR., unfortunately : - ), and lost internet connection for couple of days (and might lose it again late next week). Anyway, here's a new article of interest from the New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/07/magazine/07woodpecker.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry for the lapse; I'm busily in process of moving (...not to Brinkley, AR., unfortunately : - ), and lost internet connection for couple of days (and might lose it again late next week). Anyway, here's a new article of interest from the New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/07/magazine/07woodpecker.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday, May 02, 2006
-- The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly --
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a little over a year ago that birding websites, listservs, email boxes, newsreaders and the like went nuts as rumors flew that the Cornell Lab of Ornithology and Nature Conservancy were about to announce the rediscovery of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker in Arkansas (...will any of us ever forget that evening or next day!) -- now, a year later, after the first real widespread interest in, and search for the species in 60 years, and an ensuing controversy that no one foresaw, we await release of Cornell's current findings.
Rarely has ornithology seen a rift of such major proportions, with so many major players painted into opposite corners, and so widely covered in the media. For the still-perceived-as-genteel hobby of birdwatching we have the equivalent of a backyard brawl. The academics and professionals however can take care of themselves; what has been even uglier to see, and somehwat surprising, is the degree of animosity, aspersions, and frequent incivility generated across the internet at the lower levels of the birding avocation, as the controversy plays out (with the possibility that it may never be resolved, although I still believe it will).
Further, on the bad side, all indications are that Cornell will have no photographic or video evidence, no found nest or roost holes to report, when they release their summary for 6 months of searching (but, hey Cornell, feel free to 'make my day!'). The question in the public mind will be how they could've had 16+ sightings in the course of one year (several in a single month) and established a "hot zone," and then come up with so little on this go-around (except for a fine picture of a very leucistic Pileated, a sort of needle-in-a-haystack itself, shortly after finding it) -- there are possible explanations, but they won't play well in the public arena.
On the good side, there are several additional 'sightings' to report (the number and quality no doubt open to debate), further acoustic evidence to analyze and release, and Cornell remains steadfast in the integrity and accuracy of their original evidence. In short, there will be enough to report to support continuing interest and a second season of searching next winter (and of course other areas outside Arkansas are still to be heard from as well). Moreover, I understand there will be at least some continued monitoring of automatic camera units in the field in coming months, though physical searches have largely halted for the summer. The story is a long way from over, but unfortunately I suspect believers need to brace themselves for yet more skepticism and controversy in the next month rather than less.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a little over a year ago that birding websites, listservs, email boxes, newsreaders and the like went nuts as rumors flew that the Cornell Lab of Ornithology and Nature Conservancy were about to announce the rediscovery of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker in Arkansas (...will any of us ever forget that evening or next day!) -- now, a year later, after the first real widespread interest in, and search for the species in 60 years, and an ensuing controversy that no one foresaw, we await release of Cornell's current findings.
Rarely has ornithology seen a rift of such major proportions, with so many major players painted into opposite corners, and so widely covered in the media. For the still-perceived-as-genteel hobby of birdwatching we have the equivalent of a backyard brawl. The academics and professionals however can take care of themselves; what has been even uglier to see, and somehwat surprising, is the degree of animosity, aspersions, and frequent incivility generated across the internet at the lower levels of the birding avocation, as the controversy plays out (with the possibility that it may never be resolved, although I still believe it will).
Further, on the bad side, all indications are that Cornell will have no photographic or video evidence, no found nest or roost holes to report, when they release their summary for 6 months of searching (but, hey Cornell, feel free to 'make my day!'). The question in the public mind will be how they could've had 16+ sightings in the course of one year (several in a single month) and established a "hot zone," and then come up with so little on this go-around (except for a fine picture of a very leucistic Pileated, a sort of needle-in-a-haystack itself, shortly after finding it) -- there are possible explanations, but they won't play well in the public arena.
On the good side, there are several additional 'sightings' to report (the number and quality no doubt open to debate), further acoustic evidence to analyze and release, and Cornell remains steadfast in the integrity and accuracy of their original evidence. In short, there will be enough to report to support continuing interest and a second season of searching next winter (and of course other areas outside Arkansas are still to be heard from as well). Moreover, I understand there will be at least some continued monitoring of automatic camera units in the field in coming months, though physical searches have largely halted for the summer. The story is a long way from over, but unfortunately I suspect believers need to brace themselves for yet more skepticism and controversy in the next month rather than less.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)