Tuesday, June 17, 2025

-- eDNA --

 ———————————-------———

A FB poster passes along this fairly interesting background & overview of eDNA (1+ year-old article) as a tool in biological research. eDNA has been more regularly appearing  in IBWO-search discussions, though still not too sure how practical it is, let alone how definitive… The article calls it “relatively inexpensive” though one of the complaints I’d heard in the past was that the number of samples and tests that might be needed in looking for IBWOs would be too expensive (of course costs are always coming down)…. depends in part on circumstance: if you found an area of interesting bark-scaling it might require several samples to try for a “hit.” But say someone claims to see an Ivory-bill emerge from a cavity somewhere, probably just a couple of samples from in or around that hole might suffice. I'm not aware of any current IBWO searchers actively employing eDNA, though I think some have gathered the info needed to utilize it if a really promising opportunity arises.


https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/02/13/1088000/how-environmental-dna-is-giving-scientists-a-new-way-to-understand-our-world/

——————————------————


Thursday, June 12, 2025

-- First They Came For..... —

 —————————————----—

"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross..."  -- Sinclair Lewis


Off-topic today, bigly off-topic (…but silence not an option)…. Saturday is “No Kings” or “Hands Off” protest day (may go under other names in different localities); perhaps the largest national protests since the Viet Nam era, or possibly ever?.... while El-Presidente Bone-Spurs will merrily masturbate to his own lame military/birthday parade (wheeeeee!). Street violence seems like a foregone outcome; including deaths — primarily because THAT appears to be the goal of the PutinPuppet Administration which sees the demise of a few no-name ICE agents as sufficient for a bogus national emergency declaration and ultimate martial law (cancelling 2026 elections if GOP polling makes it necessary). Seriously, could the giddy Trumpsky/Miller/Aryan agenda & Reichian fantasy be any more obvious, by now!? Meanwhile our working Gov't. is dismantled with the remaining parts weaponized as never before, right in front of our eyes. What a sad, sad, sad, sad, sad, sad, sad, sad, day for America, the one-time envy and beacon of the world, and greatest social/political experiment of all-time, now reduced to little more than one blubber-bellied demagogue’s pathological wet dream. Try to stay safe folks, Achtung!!... (and know that however this weekend goes, the trajectory ahead doesn't look good for the near-term... but, unseen events may yet intervene).  

                         


———————-------——--——


Thursday, June 05, 2025

-- Catching Up With An Author --

 ----------------------------------------------

Today I'm privileged to interview Dr. Michael K. Steinberg, professor at University of Alabama, and author of the wonderful 2008 volume "Stalking the Ghost Bird" (focused on the search for the IBWO in Louisiana) and get his responses to some Ivory-bill-related questions. Here we go:

****************

1)  Please tell readers whatever you would like about your background, credentials, and interests as it pertains to the subject of Ivory-bills….

My credentials are that of an ivory-bill layman. I have had a lifelong interest in the species. I can’t even tell anyone exactly why other than the sheer magnetism of the bird and the mystery that surrounds it. I am a professor of geography who writes and teaches about conservation issues, including birds, but I’m not a classically trained ornithologist. My book came about because I lived in Louisiana for many years during and after earning my PhD at LSU (unrelated to the IBWP), so the search for the bird was front and center so to speak in terms of accessibility of habitat and personalities.

 

2)  Your book, which for shorthand I’ll be calling “STGB,” came out in 2008. Has there been, or are you planning, a newer edition to cover some of the findings/claims of the last 17 years? (although, ultimately, the debate hasn’t changed all that much):

 

The book came out in paperback a couple of years ago and I did a very brief update then, but I have no plans to do a full scale rewrite. I feel like there are many books and resources out now, and many people who are much closer to the issue than me. I continue to follow the issue closely, but much of my research and writing are focused elsewhere.

 

3)  When you wrote the volume you were pretty convinced of the species’ existence. Has your confidence changed at all (in either direction) in the ensuing years? And, assuming you’re still a ‘believer’ what is the strongest evidence or argument in your mind for the birds’ persistence?

 

My confidence has not changed. I know (as do you) too many highly qualified field scientists and birders who have seen the bird. I simply cannot believe that they were/are all wrong. Yes, there are similar species and people make mistakes, but I have no doubt the bird exists or existed until very recently. For example, Chuck Hunter from the USFW Service recently shared a story on social media about a friend and colleague who saw the bird from her car. The person had great credentials and had no reason to make anything up. Those are the types of reports that have convinced me the species still exists.

 

4)  How much have you personally searched for IBWOs by yourself or with others? And if you had to pick a single area in Louisiana as the most promising locale to search for someone with limited time what might you advise?

 

When I lived in Baton Rouge I spent a lot of time in and around the Atchafalaya Basin. I thought, as I described in my book, that video evidence would surface from the Patterson area. The searchers saw the bird, so I feel like they were very very close. The birds may have left that area but I still believe that it could finally be “re-discovered” around that area. I have been told of another area in Louisiana that has provided some really great evidence much more recently, but I am not able to really share that area. I have not visited it either, so I am less familiar with it. Also, the area searched by Geoff Hill in the Florida Panhandle provided good evidence. It seems like that area should be revisited.

 

5)  Your volume is full of wonderful stories of so many characters and claimants in recent Louisiana IBWO history, two of which I'll specifically ask about: Are Jay Boe and Scott Ramsey [these were 2 individuals with especially interesting claims] still around and have you stayed in touch with them?

More generally, have you remained in touch with other locals included in STGB and gleaned anything new and/or significant from anyone since the book came out?

[…your discussion of and interaction with Fielding Lewis, before his passing, is quite fascinating as well, for any readers who may wish to read more about the whole Lewis story]

 

I really have only stayed in touch with Tommy Michot. So many people have retired or passed away sadly that the list of people who were my contacts has grown much smaller. Also, as you know, the emotions and intensity of the birding world are very strong. Some people simply wanted to move on after the book came out.

 

6)  One notable person missing from your volume is Michael Collins, who has several IBWO sightings (and related publications) from the Pearl River WMA region. Were Mike’s claims not yet hitting the Web at the time you were researching the book, or is there any other reason he is not included? And have you conversed with him in years since STGB came out?

 

I regret not including his research. But, it seemed that at the time he had his own publishing and research agenda and I didn’t feel like I could tell part of his story without stealing some of his thunder. There were also so many stories and so many big personalities that I had to limit what I included at some point. But yes, I should have reached out more.

 

7)  More recently, as you likely know, Matt Courtman has been very focused on certain areas of the Tensas WMA, where he claims several sightings over the last few years. Have you had an opportunity to speak with him?

 

I have not spoken with him. I know his work and have found it and his research very interesting, but I am pretty much on the sideline of the search so I have not kept up personally with many folks currently involved in searches. Tensas is certainly an interesting location given the obvious importance to the IBWO in the early 20th century. If I still lived in Louisiana I think I would be much more involved to this day, but my career has taken me since then to Maine, Hawaii, and now Birmingham AL. There doesn’t seem to be much interest or recent sighting in AL, so I have become sort of disconnected from Louisiana.


8)  The Louisiana Ornithological Society is a long-time excellent birding group comprised of many expert field birders, but as far as I can tell they have long been verrry negative and scoffing toward any notion of IBWOs extant in Louisiana. Am just curious if in the course of your research you had occasion to speak on the subject with any of their leading members and if so, how that went, or if your book brought any response from them?

 

This group is one reason I have moved on so to speak. I knew many of the personalities, but their criticism of the ivory-bill search and searchers became too intense for me. I believe what I believe based on what I have seen and read. I don’t mind disagreement, but life is too short for vitriolic rhetoric. If someone believes they saw the bird and have some knowledge of the issue, I don’t (and never have) understood the personal attacks.


[...Even understanding the historical importance, it's always seemed a tad funny to me that the Society has long used the Ivory-bill proudly as its group emblem, yet seems to intensely oppose any notion that the species could persist in Louisiana.]


9)  Lastly, many naysayers have this mistaken notion that somehow IBWO-like habitat has been searched exhaustively or is frequented by humans regularly — this isn’t even true of much of the remote and inhospitable public acreage available, but it’s especially not true of other large plots of land that are owned privately (one of the reasons often given for Fielding Lewis’s anonymity over decades is that he didn’t want to expose his own buddies’ parcels that might harbor IBWOs to any public disclosure).

You regularly mention the sort of anti-Government, anti-regulation mindset that often prevails. Conservationists have actually had quite a few successes dealing with private landowners when endangered species are involved (the Red-cockaded Woodpecker being one common example), but how hopeful are you that IF a creature as charismatic and sought-after as IBWOs are ever confirmed on private land in La., an amicable/workable forward-looking plan could even be put in place?

 

I agree, so much is out there still to be studied. And as I said in my book (I think) there is more habitat today than in the past 100 years). I am actually more optimistic today than in the past (although current changes within the US FW Service and Department of the Interior may change my optimism). As you mention there are some notable successes, and I do think the fear of “feds” taking land over was and is an old timey perception held by fewer people today than in the past. But, the rural South is also very slow to change so I’m sure some people still hold those views. I actually think when a clear video etc. surfaces, it will likely be on federal or state lands or at least land adjoining state and federal lands so the management may not be as cumbersome as I wrote about. Also, the growing interest in birds and birding I think has probably calmed the waters a bit in terms of this issue.


THANKS! for taking part here Dr. Steinberg and much success in your future studies and endeavors... Meanwhile, if you haven't already read it, get a copy of "Stalking the Ghost Bird" and give it a whirl; it's an interesting look at a single state and a fascinating cast of characters.

  ----------------------------------------------




Monday, June 02, 2025

-- Old Mystery -- +Addendum

 ------------------------------------------------


Again today will do exactly what I wished to avoid doing, which is replay or rehash old material, but there just doesn’t seem to be anything new and significant coming down the pike.... except more and more and more Pileated pictures :(( (...already put this on a Facebook page, where Don Scheifler had brought it up, but since so many have abandoned FB and Mark Zuckerberg’s clutches, you may not have seen it there). 

Close to a dozen years ago Don was unearthing various old IBWO-related documents when one was particularly interesting or cryptic — the above letter from a James McClellan mentioning Ivory-bills on private timber land in 1967. That set me off on a wild goose chase that was neveresolved but I covered in these 4 postings a dozen years ago (still interesting, and just maybe, perhaps, possibly someone out there does know, as Paul Harvey would've said, the rest of the story -- WAS a population of IBWOs being protected by timber operators in the late 1960s? verrrry unlikely, but who knows):

https://ivorybills.blogspot.com/2013/05/houston-files.html


https://ivorybills.blogspot.com/2013/06/speculatin.html


https://ivorybills.blogspot.com/2013/06/follow-up.html


https://ivorybills.blogspot.com/.../what-did-they-know...


And the below letter from Harry Goodwin of USFWS is what initiated the above letter:




Thanks again to Don for originally finding and sharing all this....

-----------------------------------------------


ADDENDUM:  To add to the murkiness, I’ll just add this quote from the USFWS “Draft Recovery Plan” which someone sent me back at the time to contend that USFWS simply never verified any IBWO presence on private timberland company grounds:


In the early 1970’s Sam Houston National Forest in east Texas proposed to modify timber harvests based on three unconfirmed Ivory-billed Woodpecker sightings by their staff (Ruediger 1971). These and other sightings in east Texas were never widely accepted and, consequently, did not stimulate forest management changes to promote the welfare of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker. Similar stories of unconfirmed sightings have generated no change in land management throughout the southeast. “

I still don’t know what to believe…. perhaps this 1970s' finding doesn’t actually apply to McClellan’s 1967 reference, or for the conspiracy-minded, maybe (though I doubt it) USFWS is covering its own tracks and not wanting to grant the public any knowledge of 1960s' IBWOs. Also possible (I believe) that there have always been 2 schools of thought within USFWS re: IBWOs, one far more skeptical, and one leaning more open or even optimistic to the possibility of IBWOs…. and depending who is writing something up the words may slant one way or the other. So I'm still left hanging, though it is simply hard to imagine any way that timber companies could have been protecting multiple confirmed IBWOs in the 1960s and word of it never leaked to the gossipy birding community ;) (that's the problem with all conspiracy theories is that people TALK!) 





Sunday, June 01, 2025

-- The Numbers Game --

 -------------------------------------------------

Fred Virrazzi offers a draft/tentative assessment of current IBWO population numbers here [CORRECTION: what is presented are old 2005 estimates; updated 2025 estimates are in-process, with fewer question marks; see Fred comment below]:

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1D4sFuQQgR/

Not looking super hopeful (though more than Tanner estimated 80+ years ago).... on the other hand perhaps the most important points are all the question marks included ;) ...plenty of room left for continued speculation and new data.

 ------------------------------------------------

Thursday, May 29, 2025

-- Chuck Hunter Retires --

 --------------------------------------------------

In a longish message on Facebook, Chuck Hunter has announced his retirement from USFWS after 37 years of doing what he loved, and was so good at! 

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/16M7W8HRVq/

I won't try to encapsulate Chuck's contributions to the Ivory-bill story (it would take too long, and if you've followed the story long enough you know many of them; besides to even speak of his IBWO work would almost be to shortchange his myriad contributions to so many other environmental/ecological issues/studies).

May he rest and recharge in retirement, and may we be lucky enough to continue to hear from him for years to come!

--------------------------------------------------

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

-- Readings --

 --------------------------------------------------

Will take a moment to recommend that, if you are on Facebook and not already doing so, follow Charles Alexander’s “Ivory-billed Woodpecker” group page for the interesting history and excellent writing it provides (without the controversy and fuming that can accompany the subject):

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1440928267041569

...and on a separate note, if you've still not read J. Christopher Haney’s 2021 “Woody’s Last Laugh” you can sample portions of it here:

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Woody_s_Last_Laugh/BI9JEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PT4&printsec=frontcover

A reminder that so many of the questions I see come up on social media about the Ivory-billed Woodpecker are readily answerable at the Wikipedia page for the subject (...as well of course by simply looking on Google):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivory-billed_woodpecker


As an old codger, it's actually kind of annoying to me to see how often people employ social media to answer questions that can be answered with a little bit of self-research -- as if a kind of laziness has set in and folks are sacrificing the skill of doing their own research in favor of being spoon-fed, despite the Web being such an incredible tool for self-education. Social media can be especially prone to misinformation, and even moreso to what I call "malinformation" -- information that is true, but so over-simplified, limited, spotty, or spun in some biased way, as to still be misleading. Off my soapbox...


...and finally, a reminder that the USFWS's final “Recovery Plan For The Ivory-billed Woodpecker” (from 2010) is freely available online here (chockfull of info):


https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/100719.pdf


[...sorry, so few responded to the prior post asking for how people originally became interested in the IBWO, but you can continue sending in any responses to my email at top of page, or to the prior post]

-------------------------------------------------



Saturday, May 24, 2025

-- How Did It Start For You? --

——--------------------————————


People’s interest/fascination with the Ivory-billed Woodpecker often borders on obsessive… especially among “believers.” Might be interesting to hear how/why/when folks following the saga first got so interested in the topic.  If you remember how you got drawn in, be it a year ago or 60 years ago, feel free to drop me a few sentences or paragraph explaining it. IF I get enough responses maybe(?) I can fashion them into some sort of a blog post (I’ll assume it’s OK to use your name unless you specifically say to call you “Anonymous” or some other designation, like “Louisiana Lad”). email me at cyberthrush[AT]gmail.com or just send along as a comment here.


——--------------------————————

Tuesday, May 20, 2025

— How Many Leucistic PIWOs? --

 ————————————————

Since I bring up the issue of leucistic Pileateds with some regularity (including previous post) I'll repeat here what I recently posted over at a Facebook site (for the MANY who no longer patronize FB). Someone had posed the question, how many leucistic PIWOs are there? Not a question that can be answered with precision obviously, but I figured it would be fun (anal-compulsive?) to take a stab at it so did a li’l research, a li’ math, a li’l logic:


1)   Estimates are that 1 in 30,000 birds have some degree of leucism (though specific species could probably vary from that quite a bit; and the degree of leucism obviously varies).


2)  It’s estimated that there are 2.6 million total Pileateds in North America.

So using the 1-in-30,000 figure that would make for less than 90 total individual leucistic PIWOs (given the number that show up on YouTube & birding sites I suspect that figure may be LOW, but whatever, we’re just playin’ here).


3)  PIWOs have a wide range in N. America so perhaps less than half the total would be in the Southeastern United States (one might actually be able to use official spring & winter bird counts to get a better idea what proportion of PIWOs reside in say 8 -10 southeast states versus the rest of their range).


4)  So, assuming less than half of PIWOs reside in SE states, now we’re down to less than 50 leucistic individuals in possible IBWO habitat. And then, acknowledging that MOST leucistic PIWOs won’t look anything like an Ivory-bill, we’re really only interested in the small % of 50 who’s leucistic pattern might give them an IBWO-like appearance; likely a very small number of birds (5 or less) strewn across a LOT of acres. [ADDED: and actually a LOT of those acres would NOT represent good IBWO habitat.]


5)  Even allowing what I think are pretty conservative numbers here, leading to a quite small number of individuals, keep in mind that Pileateds can fly long distances and live 4 - 10 years, so even a single bird might actually account for quite a number of errant sightings over its full lifetime.


6)  Also, do not forget that there are several OTHER largish woodland birds (waterbirds, crows, raptors)  that could bear a leucistic pattern mimicking an IBWO in flight (we are not actually restricted to PIWOs, except when a mystery spotted bird can be confirmed as a woodpecker).


Anyway, this is all pretty speculative, intended as a sort of fun thought-exercise…. and a way to confirm for myself the possibility that a number of brief and/or distant IBWO claims (especially from the inexperienced, and those repeatedly instructed to focus on the white saddle or trailing edge) could be leucistic individuals.


 ————————————————



Saturday, May 17, 2025

— Matters That Keep Me Awake At Night — ;)

 ————————————————————


[ How many of these are flying around the Southeast U.S.... nobody knows... ]

I’ve repeatedly covered all this before, but with so many new folks oddly drawn into the Ivory-bill story recently (despite little new evidence) maybe worth stating yet again in a single posting, the things troubling me most:

1)  Large partially leucistic woodland birds (with abnormal white feathering) exist. Not just leucistic Pileateds, but leucistic herons, anhingas, ducks, other waterfowl, crows, raptors… and they in turn may have mutant parents, siblings, offspring. In distant and/or brief observations a few could seem like Ivory-bills (especially with people often being encouraged to focus so strongly on the ’trailing white edge’). Such birds of course are very rare… exactly as are purported IBWO sightings…. 


2)  People have searched for, and tried to define Ivory-bill treework (cavities, scaling) for decades. Automatic cameras (not subject to human foibles, and working hours on end) have been focused on such selected, suspected work (taking millions of snapshots) and yet never clearly captured an Ivory-billed Woodpecker, despite this species foraging and using cavities every day of its life. Additionally, the ACONE system, used in the Big Woods to snap pics of birds using the most obvious open flyway through the area, never detected an IBWO.  :(


3)  For Ivory-bills to be around today, there likely had to be many more than the 2 dozen Tanner estimated in the entire South in the 40s. There is a fine line between there being ENOUGH IBWOs persisting to account for them continually existing through the last 80+ years (especially given how many states that claims still come from), yet so few existing that credible encounters (visual or auditory) with them are as infrequent as they are. It is possible, but the math is dicey because of the problems of genetic bottleneck and healthy stock.


With all that said, I happen to still believe the species exists in at least 3 states (in fact I think the ONLY way for it to likely persist at all is to be in multiple states), but I recognize the fine 'threading of a needle' that must entail for that to be the case. It is why, for me, IF Ivory-bills are ever documented, the interesting story won't be that they were found, but rathetrying to understand the deficiencies of human science that allowed them to hang on so easily/successfully out of sight for so long!


————————————————